Like many of you I am sure, I had to wrestle my way around
London during the recent tube strike. It
was busy, extremely so, at times, but the London Underground stations that were
open and where trains were running were generally staffed by helpful staff and
volunteers in high-vis jackets who were helping weary commuters complete their
journey.
As I was an unprepared commuter (dead phone battery, no
newspaper and certainly no book), I was more acutely aware of the automated announcements seemingly being made at
every few seconds.
Customer care on trains I guess is all about getting people
to their destination in a timely fashion.
As commuters we hope for regular services in a safe clean train. So that’s it isn’t it? Well, no of course not as that was before our
expectations were augmented to include the need for timely, accurate
information and some comfort and lots of other key “touch points” along the way. The new “through trains” on the Circle line
(and others) certainly meet some of those comfort needs aplenty – space,
air-conditioning and no closed carriages so now crowded suddenly feels quite…..well,
comfortable!
The other need we have is for timely information –
especially in an age obsessed with speed.
There is of course a big uproar about closing ticket offices (hence the
strike) but actually I refer to the automated information being given below
ground. It reminded me that now we’re in
the age where we are now, frankly,
bombarded and I lost count of the number of announcements made during my
journey. Why is it necessary to have such
an assault on the senses? Is it because
it is:
- · an integral part of the customer service (because everyone needs this information all of the time) so more announcements mean we are fulfilling that need?
- · avoiding the need to have lots of staff (good for productivity and hence profitability) but we have to have visibility so we need lots of announcements?
- · to obviate the problems with humans doing customer care (ie. can be difficult to manage and control how well and frequently messages are transmitted). Without automated messages, train drivers would have more opportunities to practise their audition for Britain’s Got Talent. We could end up with this type of thing (which I do love) "Ladies and Gentlemen, I do apologise for the delay to your service. I know you're all dying to get home, unless, of course, you happen to be married to my ex-wife, in which case you'll want to cross over to the Westbound and go in the opposite direction".
My theory is, in the main, it’s because we now provide
customer care in an age where speed is more important, certainly in the case of
travel! It’s easier to standardise information
into announcements and keep them coming to ensure the message gets out than it
is to provide the human touch. It misses the point of good customer service
though – which is accurate and timely.
As we’re using technology we should be able to avoid errors such as
being on the last east-bound Jubilee Line train, and listening to announcements
about connections we couldn’t make because of closed stations – all of which
were in the other direction.
Once I was finally on my over-ground train home, I was
subjected to more automated announcements whilst seated in the so-called quiet
carriage. “Ping Pong” came the sound every
time we arrived at a station – only this
time they’d not pushed the switch to reflect the train was now going the other
way.
Health and safety is such an important issue to cover off
too. We must ensure we say stuff
repeatedly “just in case”. At my local
over-ground station, we’re reminded not to skateboard or cycle on the platform
and not to leave bags or parcels unattended which is fair enough you could argue. Perhaps it is also important to remember
about slippery platforms in wet weather but regularly indicating the “adverse
conditions” is a bit OTT when it’s drizzling a little. This is the UK after all.
I remember reading an article a few years ago now about how
train travel customer service was full of waffle and fluff, littered with
charters and codes of conduct. Commuters
were “customers”, “clientele”, “clients” and “patrons” and this particular
author mused he simply wanted to be a commuter again. Discussing my journey options with humans in high-vis
jackets in Marble Arch ticket hall was a bit reminiscent of the old commuting days
I thought. So if we went back to the
land of the commuter, would that reduce automated announcements? Thanks to technology leading the way, that’s
probably a destination we’ll never get to.
No comments:
Post a Comment